« Quote of the Day | Main | Compendium of Resources for Agile Project Management and Earned Value Management »

February 20, 2023

Compendium of Resources for Digital Twins, Model-Based Systems Engineering and Integrated Program Performance Management

It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage than a new system. For the initiator has the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institution and merely lukewarm defenders in those who gain by the new ones.  ‒ Prince Niccolò Machiavelli

Screen Shot 2022-01-09 at 5.13.39 PM

The Digital Twin connects the virtual world and physical world through a Digital Thread guided by Federal, ISO, and Industry standards.
These digital threads connect the design, development, and maintenance processes to the products, services, humans, and machines.
The Digital Twin establishes the contextual relationships between the Digital Thread elements to produce a seamless view of processes, assets, products, and services, managed through correlated events and their analytical information to provide a Single Authoritative Source of Truth to Decision Makers in their management of the Capabilities needed to accomplish the Mission or fulfill the Strategy.

Most all these materials can be found with Google or other scholarly research sites. 

  1. Foundations of Model-Based Systems Engineering: From Patterns to Models, Jon Holt, Simon Perry, and Mike Brownsword, Institution of Engineering and Technology, London 2016
  2. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, Second Edition, Chuck Eastman, Paul Teicholz, Rafael Sacks, and Kathleen Liston, John Wiley & Sons, 2001 – this is a good starting point for BIM. Goggle will find you an electronic downloadable version of this 611-page book.
  3. “BIM and Cost Estimating,” REVIT® Building Information Modeling, Autodesk – Autodesk has many white papers on the BIM topic. • “3D Engineered Models: Schedule, Cost, and Post‒Construction, Program Case Study – 4D and 5D modeling: NYSDOT’s Approach to Optimizing Resources,” U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA‒HIF‒16‒024.
  4. “An Alternative Approach to Collaboration 4D Construction Planning,” K. Ruikar and S. Emmitt, Editors, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, Volume 14, pg. 30, 2009.
  5. “Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide,” AIA National, 2007 Version 1.
  6. “Comparing BIM in construction with 3D modeling in shipbuilding industries: Is the grass greener on the other side?” Ran Luming and Vishal Singh, IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, 2015, pp. 193‒202.
  7. “Flexible Work Breakdown Structure for Integrated Cost and Schedule Control,” Youngsoo Jung and Sungkwon Woo, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, September/October 2004, pp. 616‒625.
  8. “HESTIA Model-Based System Engineering with SysML,” Lui Wang, Spacecraft Software Engineering Branch, JSC, May 6, 2016.
  9. “IFC Standard – A Review of History, Development, and Standardization," www.icon.org/2012/9
  10. “Importance of Integrating Cost Management with Building Information Modeling (BIM),” K. Sunil, C. Pathirage, and J. Underwood, International Postgraduate Research Conference (IPGRC 2015), 10‒12 June 2015, Salford Quays. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/35630/
  11. “Integration of Cost and Schedule Using BIM,” Su‒Ling Fan, Chen‒Hua Wu and ChienChun Hun, Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 223‒232, 2015
  12. “Intelligent BIM‒Based Construction Scheduling Using Discrete Event Simulation,” Markus König, Ilka Habenicht, Christian Koch, and Sven Spieckermann, Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 Winter Simulation Conference.
  13. “A dependency network description of building information models,” K. Al Sayed, M. Bew, and A. Penn, Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction, Cambridge Centre for Smart Infrastructure & Construction, 2016.
  14. “XML‒based Modeling of Risk Estimation Criteria to Support Safety Management in Shipbuilding,” Youhee Choi, Jeong‒Ho Park, and Byungtae Jang, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 2016 Vol I October 19‒21, 2016, San Francisco, USA.
  15. "Traditional Design versus BIM Based Design,” Ireneusz Czmocha and Adam PĊkala, XXIII R‒S‒P seminar, Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering (23RSP) (TFoCE 2014), Procedia Engineering, 91, 2014, pp. 210 – 215
  16. GSA BIM Guides, https://www.gsa.gov/real‒estate/design‒construction/3d4d‒buildinginformation‒modeling/bim‒guides
  17. “Linking Knowledge-Based Systems to CAD Design Data with an Object-Oriented Building Product Model,” Kenji Ito, Yasumasa Ueno, Raymond Levitt, and Adnan Darwiche, Center of Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, technical report Number 17, August 1989.
  18. “Towards a model-based system specification and verification in integrated AEC‒projects integrating SysML and BIM as initial step,” M. J. Granville, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2019.
  19. “Virtual Construction of Space Habitats: Connecting Building Information Models (BIM) and SysML,” Raul Polit‒Casillas and A. Scott Howe, AIAA Space 2013 Conference and Exposition, September 10‒12, 2013.
  20. “Applying Systems Modeling Approaches to Building Construction,” Francisco Valdes, Russell Gentry, Charles M. Eastman, Stephen Forrest, 33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, July 2016
  21. “BIM-based Integrated Framework for Detailed Cost Estimation and Schedule Planning of Construction Projects," Hxu Liu, Ming Lu, and Mohammed Al‒Hussein, 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining, 2014.
  22. “Building Information Management (BIM) Implementation in naval construction,” Raymond Rohena, LSU Master’s Theses, 2011.
  23. “Comparing BIM in construction with 3D modeling in shipbuilding industries: Is the grass greener on the other side?” Ran Luming and Vishal Singh, IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, 2015, pp. 193‒202.
  24. “OMG Systems Modeling Language,” Version 1.6, November 2019.
  25. “Functional Modelling and Simulation of Overall System Ship – Virtual Methods for Engineering and Commissioning in Shipbuilding,” Olaf Berndt, Arjan Kuijper, Proceedings 29th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, 2015.
  26. “DoD BIM Contract Requirements: Best Practices,” Leo Fernandez, Society of Military Engineers.
  27. “A Model-Based Systems Engineering Methodology for Employing Architecture in System Analysis: Developing Simulation Models using Systems Modeling Language Products to Link Architecture and Analysis,” Paul T. Beery, Naval Postgraduate School, June 2016
  28. “Application of BIM technology in operation of port marine structures,” Pavel Garibin and Evgeniy Ol’khovik, E3S Web Conferences, 135, 01022, 2019
  29. “Integrated Digital Shipbuilding: Concept of Operations for the Model-Based Enterprise,” Newport News Shipbuilding, https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2017/04/18/07_debbink_conops_integrated_digital_shipbuilding_‒_nist_mbe_2017.pdf
  30. “CAD/CAM Software for Shipbuilding and Offshore Projects,” www.ShipConstructor.com
  31. sysML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Systems Modeling Language, Lenny Delligatti, Addison‒Wesley, 2014.
  32.  A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language, Sanford Friedenthal, Alan Moore, and Rick Steiner, Morgan Kaufmann, 2012.
  33. “Benchmarking Naval Shipbuilding with 3D Laser Scanning, Additive Manufacturing, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management, Johnathan Mun, Naval Postgraduate School, October 2015.
  34. “Transferring best practices enabled by Building information modeling (BIM) in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction to Shipbuilding Industry: An explorative study,” Vishal Singh, Aalto University, 12/5/2015.
  35. “Shop Product Modeling,” R. I. Whitfled, A. H. B Duffy, J. Meehan, and Z. Wu, CAD
  36. Centre, Department of Design Manufacture and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  37. “Advantages of using SysML Compatible with ISO 10303‒233 for Product Design and Development based on STEP Standard,” Omid Fatahi Valilai and Mahmoud Houshmand, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 2009 Vol II, WCECS 2009, October 20‒22, 2009, San Francisco, USA.
  38.  A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language, Sanford Friedenthal, Alan Moore, and Rick Steiner, Morgan Kaufmann, 2012.
  39. “Benchmarking Naval Shipbuilding with 3D Laser Scanning, Additive Manufacturing, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management, Johnathan Mun, Naval Postgraduate School, October 2015.
  40. “Transferring best practices enabled by Building information modeling (BIM) in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction to Shipbuilding Industry: An explorative study,” Vishal Singh, Aalto University, 12/5/2015.
  41. “Shop Product Modeling,” R. I. Whitfled, A. H. B Duffy, J. Meehan, and Z. Wu, CAD
  42. Centre, Department of Design Manufacture and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  43. “Advantages of using SysML Compatible with ISO 10303‒233 for Product Design and Development based on STEP Standard,” Omid Fatahi Valilai and Mahmoud Houshmand, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 2009 Vol II, WCECS 2009, October 20‒22, 2009, San Francisco, USA.
  44. Toward Shipbuilding 4.0 ‒ An Industry 4.0 Changing the Face of Shipbuilding Industry,” Venesa Stanić, Marko Hadjina, Nikša Fafandjel, and Tin Matulja, Brodogradnja, September 2018.
  45. “An Introduction to Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE),” Nataliya Shevchenko, Software Engineering Institute Dec 21, 2020.
  46. “Navantia’s Digital Twin Implementation Perspective in Military Naval Platform Lifecycle,” https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Proceedings/STO-MP-MSG-171/MP-MSG-171-P1.pdf
  47. “Gartner Survey Reveals Digital Twins Are Entering Mainstream Use,” February 20, 2019, Gartner Digital Twin Best Modeling Practices.
  48. “A Real-Time Physical Progress Measurement Method for Schedule Performance Control Using Vision, an AR Marker and Machine Learning in a Ship Block Assembly Process,” Taihun Choi1and Yoonho Seol, Sensors, 2020
  49. “The digital twin: from hype to reality,” ABB Review, Jul 2021, https://new.abb.com/news/detail/80770/the‒digital‒twin‒from‒hype‒to‒reality
  50. “Digital Twin Development: Condition Monitoring and Simulation Comparison for the ReVolt Autonomous Model Ship,” Alexander Danielsen‒Haces, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, June 2018.
  51. “Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Media Study,” Julia Murray, May 2, 2012.
  52. “Implementing a Model-Based, Digital Engineering Enterprise for a Defense Systems Integrator ‒ an Ongoing Journey,” Gan Wang, Ph.D., 30th Annual INCOSE International Symposium, July 20‒22, 2020.
  53. “Characteristics of Model-Based Systems Engineering,” Warren B. Smith, 2013 INCOSE Chapter Meeting. https://www.incose.org/docs/default‒source/orlando/presentation‒20130115‒mbse.pdf
  54. “Systematic Literature Review: How is ModelBased Systems Engineering Justified?” Edward R. Carroll and Robert J. Malins, SANDIA Report SAND2016‒2607, March 2016 https://www.incose.org/docs/default‒source/enchantment/161109‒carrolled‒howismodel‒basedsystemsengineeringjustified‒researchreport.pdf
  55. “How to Fail at MBSE,” Matthew Hause, 2013, INCOSE Texas Gulf Chapter, https://www.incose.org/docs/default‒source/texas‒gulf‒coast/m_hause_how_to_fail_at_mbse.pdf
  56. Integrated Program Management Data Analysis Report (IPMDAR) Implementation & Tailoring Guide, https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/ae/ada/ipm/docs/IPMDAR%20Implementation%20Guide%20‒%20Oct2020%20‒%20For%20Public%20Release%20‒%20Signature%20Edition.pdf
  57. ADA Integrated Program Management, https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/ae/ada/ipm/policy‒guidance.html
  58. Developing a Digital Twin and Digital Thread Framework for an ‘Industry 4.0’ Shipyard, Applied Sciences, 25 January 2021
  59. Empowering the Digital Twin with Integrated Modeling and Simulation, https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SAS2021/SAS2021‒EmpoweingDigitalTwin_NSWC_Crane.pdf
  60. “On principles for model-based systems engineering,” Ingmar Ogren, INCOSE Systems Engineering Journal, 14 February 2000.
  61. “Generic Model-Based Systems Engineering Methodology,” Bernard Meyer, Bei den Kleinen Haeusern, INCOSE Systems Engineering Journal, 27 August 2015.
  62. “Modeling and Visualization of Complex Systems and Enterprises: Explorations of Physical, Human, Economic, and Social Phenomena ‒  Explorations of Physical, Human, Economic, and Social Phenomena,”  William B. Rouse, Stevens Institute on Complex Systems and Enterprises, William B. Rouse, Series Editor, Wiley, 2015.
  63. “Incorporating Modularity into Ship System Design for Increased Adaptability,” Kristen A. Bradshaw, Michael Robinson, Frank Scazzuso, Sean M. Gallagher, and Tyson Browning, MAST, Malmo Sweden, 11‒13 September 2012.
  64. “Dynamic Visualization of Complex Systems ‒ Extending the Impact of Model-Based Systems Engineering,” Troy A. Peterson, NDIA 18th Annual Systems Engineering Conference, October 26‒29.
  65. Enterprise System‒of‒Systems Model for Digital‒Thread Enabled Acquisition Technical Report SERC‒2018‒TR‒109, July 13, 2018.
  66. “United States Navy and Marine Corps, Digital Systems Engineering Transformation Strategy 2020, Naval Postgraduate School, 2020.
  67. “Department of Defense Digital Engineering Strategy,” June 2018, Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering.
  68. “Digital Engineering Strategy and Implementation,” Ms. Philomena Zimmerman, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense of Research and Engineering, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Model-Based Enterprise Summit, April 3, 2019.
  69. “Integration of model-based system engineering into the digital twin concept,”  Yüdo Wang, Tanja Steinbach, Jonathan Klein, and Reiner Anderl, 31st CIRP Design Conference, 2021
  70. “Model-based system engineering: Towards a digital twin platform,” Valtteri Laakkonen, Aalto University, 25.9.2020.
  71. “Digital Engineering,” Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge, SEBoK, https://www.sebokwiki.org/wiki/Digital_Engineering
  72. “Semantic Microservice Framework for Digital Twins,” Gernot Steindl and Wolfgang Kastner, Applied Science, 2021, 11, 5633.
  73. “Applying Model-Based Systems Engineering to Reduce Weapon System Development Cycle Time,” Mary Compton and Mariss Conroy, INCOSE International Workshop, January 2019.
  74. “What Constitutes an Authoritative Source?” Roger Westman, MITRE, September 2, 2009, https://csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/events/privilege-management-workshop/documents/presentations/roger_westman.pdf
  75. “Extending the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy to Mission, Systems of Systems, and Portfolios, Ms. Philomena Zimmerman, Dr. Tracee Gilbert, and Dr. Judith Dahmann, 22nd Annual NDIA Systems and Mission Engineering Conference, 23 October 2019.
  76. “Enterprise System-of-Systems Model, Digital-Engineering Transformation Summary,” Report of SERC Technical Report SERC-2018-TR-109 Summary Report SERC-2018-STR-109 November 20, 2018
  77. “Modular Open Systems Approach, Considerations Impacting Both Acquirer and Supplier Adoption,” National Defense Industrial Association, Systems Engineering Architecture Committee, July 1, 2020.
  78. “WRT-1025: Architecting for Digital Twins and MCE with AI/ML Part II,” SERC-2021-TR-007, DR. Mark Blackburn, Systems Engineering Research Center, 2021-04-21
  79. “SE M&S Integration Framework in the Digital Thread, Technical Report SERC-2016-TR-115,” DR. Gary Witus and Mr. Steve Rapp, Systems Engineering Research Center, 28 October 2016.
  80. System Design, Modeling, and Simulation Using Ptolemy II, Claudius Ptolemaeus, Editor, https://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/books/Systems/PtolemyII_DigitalV1_02.pdf
  81. Ptolemy II Project https://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/ptolemyII/index.htm
  82. Authoritative Source of Truth, OMG MBSE Wiki, https://www.omgwiki.org/MBSE/doku.php?id=mbse:authoritative_source_of_truth
  83. “Digital Engineering Discussions,” Philomena M. Zimmerman, May 19, 2021.
  84. “Digital Model-Based Engineering: Expectations, Prerequisites, and Challenges of Infusion,” NASA/TM-2017-219633, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170006995/downloads/20170006995.pdf
  85. “What is a Single Source of Truth?” John Spacey, November 11, 2016, https://simplicable.com/new/single-source-of-truth
  86. “Systems Engineering Digital Engineering Fundamentals,” Department of Defense Digital Engineering Working Group, Version 1.0, 2016. https://ac.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/DE-Fundamentals.pdf
  87. “Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation (JDMS) special issue: Transforming the engineering enterprise—applications of Digital Engineering and Modular Open Systems Approach,” Kristen Baldwin, February 13, 2018, Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Application, Methodology, Technology.
  88. “Enterprise System-of-Systems Model for Digital-Thread Enabled Acquisition,” Technical Report SERC-2018-TR-109, July 13, 2018.
  89. “Towards Model-Driven Digital Twin Engineering: Current Opportunities and Future Challenges,” Francis Bordeleau, Benoit Combemale, Romina Eramo, Mark van den Brand, Manuel Wimmer
  90. “Analysing Systems Interdependencies Using a Digital Twin,” Final Reporting, 10 July 2019, Centre for Digital Built Britain.
  91. “Applying The Design Structure Matrix To System Decomposition And Integration Problems: A Review And New Directions,” Tyson Browning, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 292-306, September 2001.
  92. “Understanding design change propagation in complex engineering systems using a digital twin and design structure matrix,” Long Chen, Jennifer Whyte, Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 6 July 2021.
  93. “Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin,” Eric J. Tuegel, Anthony R. Ingraffea, Thomas G. Eason, and S. Michael Spottswood, International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2011.
  94. “Digital Transformation for Defense Acquisition: Digital Engineering Competency Framework (DECF),” Excerpt from the Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Acquisition Research Symposium, May 11-13, 2021.
  95. “Model-Based Systems Engineering in Support of Complex Systems Development,” J. Stephen Topper and Nathaniel C. Horner, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest Volume 32, Number 1, 2013.
  96. “Navy Optimizing Shipyards With Digital Twin Technology (Updated),” Yasmin Tadjdeh, National Defense, 3/1/2021, https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2021/3/1/navy-optimizing-shipyards-with-digital-twin-technology
  97. “NAVSEA Seeing Ship Sustainment Successes With Digital Twins, But Wants A More Comprehensive Tool,”  Megan Eckstein, US Naval Institute, May 14, 2021, https://news.usni.org/2021/05/14/navsea-seeing-ship-sustainment-successes-with-digital-twins-but-wants-a-more-comprehensive-tool
  98. “Navy using ‘digital twins’ to speed innovation to the fleet,” Jared Serbu, Federal Insights, May 14, 2020, https://federalnewsnetwork.com/federal-insights/2020/05/navy-using-digital-twins-to-speed-innovation-to-the-fleet/
  99. “US Army Digital Engineering Implementation,” Jeremy Turner, Engineering and Technology, 3 April 219, US Army, Program Executive Office, Aviation. Disciplinary
  100. Convergence in Systems Engineering Research, Azad M. Madni, Barry Boehm, Roger G. Ghanem, Daniel Erwin and Marilee J. Wheaton Editors, Springer, 2018
  101. “Requirements in Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE),” Nataliya Shevchenko, February 22, 2021, SEI Blog.
  102. “Introduction To Model-Based System Engineering (MBSE) and SysML,” Laura E. Hart, Delaware Valley INCOSE Chapter Meeting, July 30, 2015.
  103. A Primer for Model-Based Systems Engineering, 2nd Edition, David Long and Zane Scott, Vitech, 2011.
  104. “Towards digital engineering: the advent of digital systems engineering,” Jingwei Huang, A.V Gheorghe, Holly Handle, Charles Daniels, et al International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 10(3), January 2020.
  105. “Exploring Industry 4.0 paradigm as applied to project management towards proof of concept,” Waseem Khan, Thesis for MS Engineering and Management, Politecnico Di Torino, Dec 2019.
  106. “Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review,” David Jones, Chris Snider, Aydin Nassehi, Jason Yon, and Ben Hick, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing and Technology, 29 (2020), pp. 36-52.
  107. “Managing The Context Of Product Complexity Using The Digital Twin,” Aras, https://www.aras.com/-/media/files/resources/1120-eb-managing-context-using-digital-twin.ashx
  108. “Department of the NAVY: Probability of Program Success (PoPS), DODCAS DON Service Breakout, CAPT Jim Baratta, 19 February 2010, https://www.ncca.navy.mil/dodcas/briefings/DODCAS2010-POPS_v2.pdf
  109. “U. S. Air Force, Probability of Program Success (PoPS) Spreadsheet, Operations Guide,” Version 9.6, July 2007.
  110. “A Guide for DoD Program Managers,” William T. Cooley and Brian C. Ruhm, Defense Acquisition University, December 2014, https://acqnotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/A-Guide-for-DoD-Program-Managers.pdf
  111. “Integrate or Innovate: Controlling Schedule Risk in Major Defense Acquisition Programs,” Manuel, Daniel G., Jr., The George Washington University.
  112. “Weaving digital transformations with digital thread,” Washington Technology, https://washingtontechnology.com/whitepapers/2021/10/carahsoft-salesforce-weaving-digital-transformation-100421/asset.aspx
  113. “Acquisition Management Metrics,” Systems Engineering Guide, MITRE Corporation, https://www.mitre.org/publications/systems-engineering-guide/acquisition-systems-engineering/acquisition-program-planning/acquisition-management-metrics
  114. “Department of the Navy Probability of Program Success (PoPS), 19 Feb 2010.
  115. “Measuring Requirements Complexity to Increase the Probability of Program Success,” Holly Parsons-Hann and Kecheng Liu, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, pg. 434-438, 2005.
  116. “Navy Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution – A Reference Guide for Senior Leaders, Managers, and Action Officers,” Irv Blickstein, et. al., RAND Corporation 2016.
  117. “A Framework for Implementing Systems Engineering Leading Indicators for Technical Reviews and Audits,” Chris Orlowski, Paul Blessner, Ph.D., Timothy Blackburn, Ph.D., Bill Olson, Ph.D., Complex Adaptive Systems, Publication 5, Proceedia Computer Science 61, 2015, pp. 293-300
  118. “Defense Acquisition Guide,” https://www.dau.edu/tools/dag
  119. “Risk Analysis of Defence Acquisition Projects Methods and Applications,” Abderrahmane Sokri and Ahmed Ghanmi, DRDC – Centre for Operational Research and Analysis, DRDC-RDDC-2017-R124. https://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc286/p805787_A1b.pdf  
  120. “The Digital Twin Throughout the Systems Lifecycle,” Matthew Hause, Engineering Fellow, National Defense Industry Association, MBSE Specialist, PTC, October 2018, https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2018/systems/Thurs_21545_Hause.pdf
  121. “Digital Engineering,” Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBOK), https://www.sebokwiki.org/wiki/Digital_Engineering
  122. “Engineering Design with Digital Thread,” Victor Singh and Karen E. Willcox, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
  123. “U.S. Air Force To Develop F-16 ‘Digital Twin’ With Help From Wichita State NIAR,” Posted by DoD News | Jul 1, 2021, https://dsjournal.com/2021/07/01/u-s-air-force-to-develop-f-16-digital-twin-with-help-from-wichita-state-niar/
  124. “Enabling Digital Engineering (DE) in the Joint Capability Integration and Development System (JCIDS),” Albert C. Hoheb, Aerospace Report No. TOR-2017-01556.
  125. “Digital Twin: Empowering Enterprises Towards a System-of-Systems Approach, Marietheres Dietz and Günther Pernul, Business Information Systems Engineering 62(2), pp. 170-184, 2020.
  126. “Systems Engineering Newsletter,” PPI SyEN 92-95 August 2020, https://www.ppi-int.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PPI-SyEN-92-a.pdf
  127. “Towards Digital Engineering,” Jingwei Huang, Adrian Gheorghe, Holly Handley, Pilar Pazos, Ariel Pinto, Samuel Kovacic, Andrew Collins, Charles Keating, Andres Sousa-Poza, Ghaith Rabadi, Resit Unal, Teddy Cotter, Rafael Landaeta, Charles Daniels, International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, Volume 10, Issue 3, 2020.
  128. “The Future Exchange of Digital Engineering Data and Models: an Enterprise Systems Analysis,” Tom McDermott, Paul Collopy, Molly Nadolski, Christiaan Paredis, 17th Annual Conference of Systems Engineering Research (CSER), Procedia Computer Science (153, (2019), 260-267. https://tinyurl.com/ydl4ouxe
  129. Digital Engineering Information Exchange, https://www.incose.org/incose-member-resources/working-groups/transformational/digital-engineering-information-exchange
  130. “INCOSE Model-Based Capabilities Matrix and User’s Guide,” Version 1.0, January 2020, https://aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/INCOSE%20MBCM%20Users%20Guide%20version%205.3%20publication.pdf
  131. “Is Digital Thread/Digital Twin Affordable? A Systemic Assessment of the Cost of DoD’s Latest Manhattan Project,” Timothy D. West, and Mark Blackburn, Complex Adaptive Systems Conference with Theme: Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems, CAS October 30 – November 1, 2017.
  132. “The Development Of Standardized Models Of Digital Twin,”  Haibo Duan and Feng Tian, IFAC papers online, 53-5 (2020) 726–731.
  133. “Towards a Cyber-Physical PLM Environment: The Role of Digital Product Models, Intelligent Products, Digital Twins, Product Avatars and Digital Shadows, “David Romero, Thorsten Wuest, Ramy Harik, and Klaus-Dieter Thoben, FAC PapersOnLine 53-2 (2020) 10911–10916
  134. Open Source Solutions for Model-based Systems Engineering, Capella, https://www.eclipse.org/capella/
  135. “The Authoritative Source of Truth Enterprise Systems-of-Systems Model for Digital Thread Enabled Acquisition,” Tom McDermott, Paul Collopy, Chris Paredis, Molly Nadolski, NDIA Systems Engineering Conference, October 23, 2018, https://sercuarc.org/
  136. Strategy for an Intelligent Digital Twin (IDT), (An environment where Information replaces wasted resources), NIST Model-Based Enterprise (MBE) Summit 2019, Mark Debbink and Carla Coleman, https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2019/04/05/13d_strategy_for_an_intelligent_digital_twin_03-04-2019_-_mark_debbink.pdf
  137. “New Digital Engineering Enabled Systems and Mission Engineering Performance Measures,” Dr. Ed Kraft, NDIA Annual Systems Engineering Conference 2019, October 21-24, 2019, Tampa, FL
  138. “RT-182: Enterprise Systems-of-Systems Model for Digital Thread Enabled Acquisition,” Chris Paredis, Paul Collopy, Tom McDermott, and Molly Nadolski, INCOSE Meeting, July 9, 2018. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.omgwiki.org%2FMBSE%2Flib%2Fexe%2Ffetch.php%3Fmedia%3Dmbse%3Adeix%3Art182-reviewmeeting-20180709.pptx
  139. “Operationalizing digital twins through model-based systems engineering methods,” Jason Bickford, Douglas L. Van Bossuyt, Paul Beery and Anthony Pollman, Systems Engineering 23, pp 724-750 2020.
  140. “Digital engineering transformation across the Department of Defense,” Phil Zimmerman, Tracee Gilbert, Frank Salvatore, The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, December 20, 2017.
  141. “Analysing Interdependencies of Complex Engineering Systems Using a Digital Twin-Driven Design Structure Matrix,” Long Chen and Jennifer Whyte, Construction Research Congress, 2020.
  142. “Managing System Complexity Through Integrated TD Design Tools,” Atila Ertas and Utku Gulbulak, Atlas Publishing 2021.
  143. “Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering,” Azad M. Madni, Carla C. Madni, and Scott D. Lucero, Systems 7, 7 2019.
  144. “Digital Twin Its Role and Structure within a Modern Systems Engineering Approach,” Edward A. Ladzinski, Frank W. Poplelas, and Donald Toile.
  145. “2020 Research Transition Report,”  Systems Engineering Research Center, https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/serc.public/SSRR_2020/2020_SERC_Transition_Report_FINAL.pdf
  146. “Digital twins that learn and correct themselves,” Beatriz Moya, Alberto Badias, Icfar Alfaro, Francisco Chinesta, and Elías Cueto, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, September 2020.
  147. “WTR-1025: Architecting for Digital Twins and Model-Centric Engineering (Part II),” Dr. Mark Austin, Maria Coeiho, and Dr. Mark Blackburn, Systems Engineering Research Center, Nov. 2-4, 2021.
  148. “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Metaverse,” SyMLab HKUST, November 2021
  149. “All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda,” Lik-Hang Lee, Tristan Braud, Pengyuan Zhou, Lin Wang, Dianlei Xu, Zijun Lin, Abhishek Kumar, Carlos Bermejo, and Pan Hui, Journal of LATEX Class Files, Vol. 14, No. 8, September 2021.
  150. “Architecture Centric Virtual Integration Process (ACVIP): A Key Component of the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy,” Alex Boydston, Dr. Peter Feiler, Dr. Steve Vestal, and Bruce Lewis, Software Engineering Institute, September 2019.
  151. Engineering Complex Systems, David W. Oliver, Timothy P. Kelliher, James G. Keegan, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  152. ”Systems Engineering Measurement Primer: Basic Introduction to Measurement Concepts and Use for Systems Engineering,” INCOSE-TP-2010‒-5-02
  153. “Application of MBSE to Risk-Informed Design Methods for Space Mission Applications,” Rafael M. Perez, Master’s Project, SYS 800: Special Problems in System Engineering, Fall 2013, AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and Exposition, 4-7 August 2014, San Diego, CA.
  154. “Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Methodologies,” Jeff A. Estefan, Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California, U.S.A., INCOSE MBSE Initiative.
  155. ”Exploring the use of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) to develop Systems Architecture in Naval Ship Design,” Nadia A. Tepper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2010.
  156. “Improving simulation specification with MBSE for better simulation validation and reuse,” Henri Sohier, Pascal Lamothe, Sahar Guermazi, Mouadh Yagoubi, Pascal Menegazzi, and Aldo Maddaloni, Systems Engineering, November 2021.
  157. MIL-STD-3022, Rev. CHG-1, Department of Defense Standard Practices, Documentation of Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) for Models and Simulations.
  158. “Model-based Systems Engineering: Motivation, Current Status, and Research Opportunities,” Azad M. Madni and Michael Sievers, Systems Engineering, April 2018.
  159. “Digital Twin-Enabled Testbed for Prototyping and Evaluation Aerospace Systems: Lessons Learned,” Azad M. Madni, Dan Erwin, Carla C. Madni, IEEE 2021 Aerospace Conference.
  160. “MBSE Testbed for Rapid, Cost-Effective Prototyping and Evaluation of System Modeling Approaches,” Azad M. Madni, Applied Sciences 2021/
  161. “Conjoining Wymore’s Systems Theoretic Framework and the DEVS Modeling Formalism: Toward Scientific Foundations for MBSE,” Paul Wach, Bernard P. Zeigler, and Alejandro Salado, Applied Sciences, 27 May 2021.
  162. “Foundations For Model-based Systems Engineering And Model-based Safety Assessment,” Antoine B. Rauzy and Cecilia Haskins, Systems Engineering, 13 January 2018.
  163. “MBSE in the Department of Defense,” Ms. Philomena “Phil” Zimmerman, Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense of Systems Engineering (ODASD(DSE)), Goddard Space Flight Center Engineering Seminar, 12 May 2015.
  164. Synthetic Environment Based Acquisition (SEBA) infrastructure,” Lt. Cdr. Monty
  165. “Simulation-Based Acquisition – Has Its Time Come?,” Andy Fawkes, ITEC Advanced Engineering Conference Stuttgart, Germany‒ 16 May 2018
    “Product family design and optimization: a digital twin-enhanced approach,” Pai Zheng, Kendrik Yan Hong Lim, 53rd CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 2020, pp. 246-250.
  166. “Designing a unique Digital Twin for linear infrastructures lifecycle management,” Yvan Tchana deTchana, Gullanume Ducellier, and Remy Sebastien, Procedia CIRP, 84, pp. 545-549.
  167. “Integrated Program Management and Analysis Report (IPMDAR) Initiative and Reporting,” Mr. John McGregor, Deputy Director for EVM, Acquisition Analytics and Policy, 27 April 2020.
  168. Archetypes of Digital Twins,” Hendrik van der Valk , Hendrik Haße , Frederik Möller, and Boris Otto, Business Information System Engineering, 3 December 2021.
  169. “A method for project portfolio risk assessment considering risk interdependencies – a network perspective,” Camilo Mican, Gabriela Fermandes, and Madalen Araújo.
    “Digital Twin: Definition & Value, AIAA Position Paper, December 2020.
  170. “On generative models as the basis for digital twins,” George Tsialiamanis, David J. Wagg, Nikolaos Dervilis and Keith Worden, Data-Centric Engineering, 2021, 2:e11
  171. “The Probabilistic Digital Twin,” DNV-GL, https://ai-and-safety.dnvgl.com/probabilistic-twin/index.html
  172. “Mission Engineering, Digital Engineering, MBSE, and the Like: The One Underlying Essential Attribute,” Robert (Bob) Scheurer, Boeing.
  173. “2021 DoD Engineering Data and Modeling Working Group,” April 2021.
  174. “US Army Digital Engineering Implementation,” Jeremy Turner, 3 April 2019.
  175. “Using the Design Structure Matrix to Plan Complex Design Projects,” Nobert Doerry, ASNE Intelligent Ships Symposium, 2009.
  176. "Archetypes of Digital Twins,” Hendrik van der Valk , Hendrik Haße , Frederik Möller, and Boris Otto, Business Information System Engineering, 3 December 2021.
  177. “A method for project portfolio risk assessment considering risk interdependencies – a network perspective,” Camilo Mican, Gabriela Fermandes, and Madalen Araújo.
  178. “Digital Twin: Definition & Value, AIAA Position Paper, December 2020.
  179. “On generative models as the basis for digital twins,” George Tsialiamanis, David J. Wagg, Nikolaos Dervilis and Keith Worden, Data-Centric Engineering, 2021, 2:e11
  180. “The Probabilistic Digital Twin,” DNV-GL, https://ai-and-safety.dnvgl.com/probabilistic-twin/index.html
  181. “Mission Engineering, Digital Engineering, MBSE, and the Like: The One Underlying Essential Attribute,” Robert (Bob) Scheurer, Boeing.
  182. “2021 DoD Engineering Data and Modeling Working Group,” April 2021.
  183. “US Army Digital Engineering Implementation,” Jeremy Turner, 3 April 2019
  184. “Using the Design Structure Matrix to Plan Complex Design Projects,” Nobert Doerry, ASNE Intelligent Ships Symposium, 2009.
  185. “Digital Twin as a Service (DTaaS) in Industry 4.0: An Architecture Reference Model, Shohin Aheleroff, Xun Xu, Ray Y. Zhong, and Yuqian Lu, Advanced Engineering Informatic, Volume 47, January 2021.
  186. “Developing a Digital Twin and Digital Thread Framework for an ‘Industry 4.0’ Shipyard,” Toh Yen Pang, Juan D. Pelaez Restrepo, Chi-Tsun Cheng, Alim Yasin, Hailey Lim, and Miro Miletic, Applied Sciences, 2021, 11, 1097.
  187. ​4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century, Elena G. Popkova, Yulia V. Ragulina, and Alexsei V. Bogoviz, Springer, 2019.
  188. “Mission Engineering within the Digital Engineering Enterprise,” Kevin Flood, July 2019, AGI.
  189. “Digital Twins for Continuous Deployment in Model-Based Systems Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems,” Joost Mertensa and Joachim Denil, QUATIC’2020: 8th Software Engineering Doctoral Symposium, Sept 08, 2020.
  190. “Digital Twin-enabled MBSE Testbed for Prototyping and Evaluating Aerospace Systems: Lessons Learned,” Azad M. Madni, Dan Erwin, Carla C. Madni, Et Al, 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference, March 2021.
  191. “Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications,” Mengnan Liua, Shuiliang Fanga, Huiyue Donga, Cunzhi Xua, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
  192. “Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review,” Concetta Semeraro, Mario Lezoche, Hervé Panetto, Michele Dassisti, HAL Open Science, submitted, 5 May 2021.
  193. “An application of the Design Structure Matrix to Integrated Concurrent Engineering,” Mark S. Avnet and Annalisa L. Weigel, Acta Astronautica, 2010, pp. 937-949.
  194. "​Complexity Management in Engineering Design ‒ a Primer," Mail Maurer, Springer, 2017.
  195. “Fundamentals of System Engineering: Session 8‒Systems Integration Interface Management” Olivier L. de Weck, MIT, https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronautics-and-astronautics/16-842-fundamentals-of-systems-engineering-fall-2015/lecture-notes/MIT16_842F15_Ses_8_Sys_Int.pdf
  196. “Predictive Analytics and the Digital Twin,” Bernard Dion, ANSYS, Forum TERATEC 29 June 2016.
  197. “Digital Engineering Measurement Framework,” Version 0.95, January 25, 2022, PSM Product Number: PSM-2022-001, INCOSE Product Number: INCOSE-TPP-2021-128.
  198. “Digital Twins for Industrial Applications: Definition, Business Values, Design Aspects, Standards and Use Cases, An Industrial Internet Consortium White Paper,” Version 1.0 2020-02-18.
  199. “Model-Based Engineering Forum: All Things Related to Model-Based Engineering,” https://modelbasedengineering.com/
  200. “Model-Based Capabilities Matrix and User’s Guide,” INCOSE, Version 1.0, January 2020.
  201. “Challenges when creating a cohesive digital twin ship: a data modelling perspective,” Ícaro Aragão Fonseca and Henrique Murilo Gaspar, Ship Technology Research, 2021. Vol. 68, No. 2, pp 70-83.
  202. ​Foundations for Model-Based Systems Engineering: From Patterns to Models, Jon Holt, Simon Perry, and Mike Brownsword, The Institute of Engineering and Technology, 2016.
  203. ​​SysML for Systems Engineering: A Model-Based Approach, 2nd Edition: A Model-Based Approach, Jon Holt and Simon Perry, The Institute of Engineering and Technology, 2013.
  204. Is Digital Twin Technology Support Safety Management? A Bibliographic and Systematic Review,” Giulio Paolo Agnusdei, Valerio Elia, and Maria Grazia Gnoni, Applied Sciences, 2021, 1, 2767.
  205. “Modeling and analyzing cost, schedule, and performance in complex system product development,” Tyson Browning, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 1998.
  206. Mathematical and Computational Foundations to Enable Predictive Digital Twins at Scale,” Michael G. Kapteyn, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, May 18, 2021.
  207. “Emergence of Digital Twins,” Shoumen Palit Austin Datta, Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 14-34, 2017.
  208. “Incremental Digital Twin Conceptualisations Targeting Data-Driven Circular Construction,” Pedro Mêda, Diego Calvetti, Eilif Hjelseth, and Hipólito Sousa, Buildings, 11, 554, 2021.
  209. “Connecting the Twins: A Review on Digital Twin Technology & its Networking Requirements,” Maggie Mashaly, The 12th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks, and Technology, March 23-26, 2021.
  210. “The Role of Data Fusion in Predictive Maintenance Using Digital Twin,” Zheng Liu1, Norbert Meyendorf, and Nezih Mrad, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1949, 020023, 2018.
  211. “Systems Engineering and Research,” Wouter Leibrandt, SERC Research Review, 18 November 2019.
  212. “Systems Engineering Transformation Surrogate Pilot Experiments: Doing Everything in Models to Demonstrate the Art-of-the-Possible with Digital Signoffs,” Stevens Institute of Technology and Systems Engineering Research Center, DAU/SERC WRT-1018.
  213. “Leading Transformation of Model-Based Engineering: The Model‒Capability Matrix,” Al Hoheb and Joe Hal, The Aerospace Corporation, 2020.
  214. “INCOSE Model-Based Capabilities Matrix and User’s Guide, MBCM-RB Capabilities,” INCOSE-MBCM-2020-001.1, Jan 2020.
  215. “Model-Based Capabilities Matrix,” NDIA SEME Conference Session 22159, Al Hoheb and Joe Hale, Jan 2020.
  216. “Maritime Digital Twin Architecture,” Jan-Erik Giering and Alexander Dyck, Automatisierungstechnik 2021; 69(12): 1081–1095.
  217. “Challenges for Developing Navies to Adopt Industry 4.0,” Commodore R K Rana and Captain Sanjay Chhabra, ICEMET, OMAN 2019.
  218. “Digital Twins: Identical but Different: Building Virtual Avatars to Improve Complex Physical Products,” Jérôme Bouchard, Marsh & McLennan Companies, September 2016.
    “Chapter 6 – Digital Twins and Intelligent Decision Making,” Jack C Chaplin, Giovanna Martinez-Arellano and Andrea Mazzoleni, Digital Manufacturing Training System for SME: An Introduction, Feb 23, 2021.
  219. “Advancing digital twin implementation: a toolbox for modelling and simulation,” Soumya Singh, Max Weeber, and Kai-Peter Birke, 14th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, CIRP ICME ’20.
  220. “Conceptual framework of a digital twin to evaluate the degradation status of complex engineering systems,” Davide D’Amicoa, John Ekoyuncu, Sri Addepalli, Christopher Smith, Ed Keedwell, Jim Sibson, Steven Penver, 7th CIRP Global Web Conference, “Towards shifted production value stream patterns through inference of data, models, and technology” 2019, 61-67.
  221. “An Enabling Open-Source Technology for Development and Prototyping of Production Systems by Applying Digital Twinning,” Robert Kazała, Sławomir Luscski, Paweł Straczynski, and Albena Taneva, Processes, 2022, 10, 21
  222. “Digital Twin Reference Model Development to Prevent Operators’ Risk in Process Plants,” Maurizio Bevilacqua, et al, Sustainability 2020,12, 1088.
  223. “Engineering Digital Twin-Enabled Systems,” Tony Clark, IEEE Software, 14 February 2022.
  224. “Introduction to Digital Twin Engineering,” Hao Feng, et. al., 2021 Annual Modeling and Simulation Conference, 2021.
  225. “Digital Twin in the Military Field,” Arif Furkan, Tolga Erol, and Dilara Dogan, IEEE Internet Computing, Preprint
  226. “A Maturity Model for Digital Twin Implementations in the Commercial Aerospace OEM Industry,” Francisco Gomez Medina, et. al., 2021 10th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM)
  227. “Digital Twin Platforms: Requirements, Capabilities, and Future Prospects,” Daniel Lehner, Et. Al, IEEE Software, March-April 2022, pp. 53-61, Vol. 39.
    “Toward Autonomic, Software-Intensive Digital Twin Systems,” Luis F. Rivera, et. al, IEEE Software, March-April, pp. 20-26, vol. 39.
  228. “Structure Expertise Through BIM,” Víctor Fernández-Mora and Víctor Yepes, ArchiDOCT 17, 9 (2) DATA ii, 17.2 (9 (2)).
  229. “Digital Twin: Intersection of Mind and Machine,” Rahul Soni, Proceedings of ICCIIoT, 2019.
  230. “Digital Twin Development: A Step-by-Step Guideline,” Dedy Ariansyah, 9th International Conference on Through-life Engineering Service, 3-4 November 2020, Cranfield UK
    “The emergence of cognitive digital twin: vision, challenges and opportunities,” Xiaochen Zheng, Jinzhi Lu, and Dimitris Kiritsis, International Journal of Production Research, 2021.
  231. “Emergence of Digital Twins,” Shoumen Palit Austin Datta, Journal of Innovation Management (2017) 5 14-34.
  232. “Building Information Modeling 5D and Earned Value Management Methodologies Integration Through a Computational Tool,” Christian camilo Cardenas, P. Zapata‒Rozo, and Natalia E. Lozano‒Ramírez, Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, Vol 33 Nº3 Diciembre de 2018.
  233. “Enabling automated engineering’s project progress measurement by using data flow models and digital twins,” Helena Ebel, Theresa Riedelsheimer, and Rainer Stark, International Journal of Engineering Business Management, Volume 13- 10, 2021.
  234. “Welcome to SysML, and the Language of MBSE,” Paul White, INCOSE, October 8, 2019.
  235. ​​​Model-Based Systems Engineering with OPM and SysML, Dov Dori, Springer, 2016.
  236. “Beyond Model-Based Systems Engineering towards Managing Complexity,” Jonathan Masior, Benjamin Schneider, Mehmet Kürümlüoglu, and Oliver Riedel, 30th CIRP Design 2020.
  237. “Untangling the Digital Thread: The Challenge and Promise of Model-Based Engineering in Defense Acquisition,” Timothy D. West and Art Pyster, INCOSE Insight, 21 August 2015.
  238. “A Standards-Based Digital Twin of an Experiment with a Scale Model Ship,” Ícaro Aragão Fonseca, Henrique Murilo Gaspar, Pedro Cardozode Mello, Humberto Akira Uehara Sasak, Computer‒Aided Design, 145, 2022.
  239. “The OMG SysML-Modelica Transformation Specification: Supporting Model-Based Systems Engineering with SysML and Modelica,” Chris Paredis, Model-Based Systems Engineering Center, Georgia Tech.
  240. “Simplifying Complexity Through Model-Based Systems Engineering: Case Studies from Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems and Lockheed Martin, Dassault Systemes.
  241. ​​Mirror Worlds or the Day Software Puts the Universe in a Showbox … How it Will Happen and What It Will Mean, David Gelernter, Oxford University Press, 1992.
    “SysML-Modelica Transformation, Version 1.2,” OMG Standard, November 2012.
  242. “OMG Systems Modeling Language, Version 1.2, June 2010.
  243. “Model-Based Technical Planning: An Evaluation of Description Techniques,” Jonas Andersson and Tomas Huldt, Systems Research Forum, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp 121-138, 2009.
  244. “A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach,” Ross D. Arnold and Jon Wade, Procedia Computer Science, 44:669-678, December 2015.
  245. “Communicating strategic intent with systemigrams: Application to the network-enabled challenge,” Charles D. Blair, John T. Boardman, and Brian J. Sauser, Systems Engineering, Volume 10, Issue 4, Winter 2007.
  246. “Enterprise System-of-Systems Model for Digital-Thread Enabled Acquisition,” Technical Report SERC-2018-TR-109.
  247. “Leveraging Systemigrams for Conceptual Analysis of Complex Systems: Application to the U.S. National Security System,” Joel Mehler, Sibel McGee, Ph.D., and Robert Edson, 8th Conference of Systems Engineering Research, March 17-19, 2010.
  248. “On digital twins, mirrors and virtualisations,” K. Worden, E. J. Cross, P. Gardner, R. J. Barthorpe & D. J. Wagg, Dynamics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3: Proceedings of the 38th IMAC, A Conference on Structural Dynamic, Jan 2020.
  249. “Industrial Turing Test: concept and practice,” Zhijiang Shao, Guanghui Yang, and Zuhua Xu, 1st IEEE International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence, 2021.
  250. “What Turing Did after He Invented the Universal Turing Machine,” B. Jack Copeland and Diane Proudfoot, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 9: 491-509, 2000.
  251. “Integration of model-based systems engineering into the digital twin concept,” Yübo Wang, Tanja Steinbach, Jonathan Klein, and Reiner Anderl, Procedia CIRP, 100, 19-24, 2021.
  252. “Evidential Reasoning based Digital Complex Twins Systems for Performance Optimization of Complex Systems,” Ananda Chakraborti, Arttu Heininen, Saara Vaananen, Kari T. Koskinen, and Henro Vainio, 54th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 104, 618-623, 2021.
  253. “Digital thread in shipbuilding as a prerequisite,” Konrad Jagusch, Jan Sender, David Jericho, and Wilko Flügge, 54th CIRP 104, Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 318-323, 2012.
  254. “A Digital Twin Predictive Maintenance Framework of Air Handling Units based on Automatic Fault Detection and Diagnostics,” Haidar Hosamo Hosamo, Paul Ragnar Svennevig, Kjeld Svidt, Daguang Han, and Henrik Kofoed Nielsen, Energy, and Buildings 2022.
  255. “The COBie Guide: a commentary to the NBIMS‐US COBie standard,” Dr. Bill East, PhD, PE, F.ASCE, Mariangelica Carrasquillo‐Mangual, COBieGuide-Public-v05.
  256. “The Pathway Towards an Information Management Framework 1.0.0,” Anne Guinard, Digital Twin Hub, June 7, 2021.
  257. “Digital Twins of Product Families in Aviation Based on an MBSE-Assisted Approach,” Fabian Laukokta, Michael Hanna, and Dieter Krause, 31st CIRP Design Conference, 2021.
  258. “Closed-Loop Systems Engineering: Integrating Digital Twins into Model-Driven Engineering,” Prof. Dr-Ing. Marco Do Maio, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, 4th IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering, October 1-3, 2018.
  259. “Suggested MBSE Implementation Plan Approaches,” Jessica Knizhnik, Karen Weiland, Trevor Grondin, Jon Holladay, NASA Systems Engineering, MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.
  260. “Closed-Loop Systems Engineering—Supporting Smart System Design Adaption by Integrating MBSE and IoT,” Thomas Dickop, Sven Forte, Christo Apostolov, Jens C. Göbel, in Complex Systems Design and Management.
  261. “Digital Twin-Enabled Decision Support Services in Industrial Ecosystems,” Jürg Meierhofer, Lukas Schweiger, Jinzhi Lu, Simon Züst, Shaun West, Oliver Stoll, and Dimitris Kiritsis, Applied Sciences, 2021, 11, 11418.
  262. “Construction with digital twin information systems,” Rafael Sacks, Ioannis Brilakis, Ergo Pikas, Haiyan Sally Xie, and Mark Girolami, Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  263. “Closed-Loop Systems Engineering (CLOSE): Integrating Experimentable Digital Twins with the Model-Driven Engineering Process,” Maio, Marco Di, Kapos, George-Dimitrios, Klusmann, Niklas, Atorf, Linus, Dahmen, Ulrich, Schluse, Michael, Rossmann, Juergen, IEEE 2018 International Systems Engineering Symposium
  264. Digital Twin: Towards the Integration Between System Design and RAMS Assessment Through the Model-Based Systems Engineering,” Brusa, Eugenio, IEEE Systems Journal, 2020.
  265. “The Digital Twin Theory ‒ Designing A Test Infrastructure Using SysML,” S. Imort, A. Deuter, Direct Digital Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0
  266. “Process Prediction with Digital Twins,” Tobias Brockhoff, et. al., International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), pp. 182-187, ACM/IEEE, Oktober 2021.
  267. “A Systematic Literature Review on Adoption of Digital Twins in Manufacturing,” Ninad Sawant, Vaibhav Narwane, Irfan Siddavatam, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES), Volume 8, Issue 9, 2020, pp. 26-31.
  268. “A Hierarchical Integrated Modeling Method for the Digital Twin of Mechanical Products,” M. Zheng and L. Tian, Machines 2022, 10, 2
  269. “A Study Of MBSE Through The Development Of Modeling And Data Exchange Processes,” William Emeny, Lance Lowenberg, Lynn P. Nguyen, Ryan C. Robar, Michael H. Rubow, and Dustin G. Talley, Naval Postgraduate School, December 2020.
  270. “Lifecycle management and smart manufacturing: Modelling and implementation to utilize the digital twin,” Chengxue Huang and Hampus Wranér, Master thesis TPRMM 2018, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan – Industrial Engineering and Management Department of Production Engineering, SE-100 44 Stockholm.
  271. “PAS 1192-2:2013 Incorporating Corrigendum No. 1, Specification for information management for the capital/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modelling,” BSI, 28 March 2013.
  272. “AEC (UK) BIM Protocol Implementing UK BIM Standards for the Architectural, Engineering, and Construction industry.” Version 2.0 September 2012.
  273. “BS 1192-4:2014, Collaborative production of information Part 4: Fulfilling employers information exchange requirements using COBie – Code of practice.
    “National BIM Standard - United States® Version 3,” 2015.
  274. “Identification and analysis of UK and US BIM standards to aid collaboration,” G. Lea1, A. Ganah, J. Goulding & N. Ainsworth, Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations, Vol 149, 2015, WIT Press.
  275. “Autodesk and the UK BIM Level 2 Mandate,” 23 March 2016
  276. “Update on MBSE & BIM Work-Stream,” James Towers, INCOSE UK MBSE Interest Group, 26th September 2017.
  277. “Model-Based Systems Engineering and Through-Life Information Management in Complex Construction,” Yu Chen, Julie Jupp, HAL OpenScience, 21 March 2019.
  278. “The Real Intent of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)- Keeping Up with Complexity,” Lou Wheatcraft, Wheatcraft Consulting.
  279. “Integrated Data as a Foundation of Systems Engineering,” INCOSE July 2018.
  280. “Challenges in Applying Model-Based Systems Engineering: Human-Centered Design Perspective,” So Young Kim (JPL), David Wagner (JPL), Alejandro Jimenez (JPL), September 11, 2019.
  281. “Experimental digital twins for model-based systems engineering and simulation-based development,” Michael Schluse, Linus Atorf, and Juergen Rossmann, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 14, No. 4, April 2018.
  282. “MBSE, PLM and the Digital Thread: Market Update,” Don Tolle, CIMData, 2017.
  283. “Modeling and implementation of a digital twin of material flows based on physics simulation,” Moritz Glatt, Chantal Sinnwell, Li Yi, Sean Donohoe, Bahram Ravani, Jan C. Aurich, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58 (2021), pp. 231-245.
  284. “Digital Twin: Origin to Future,” Maulshree Singh, Evert Fuenmayor, Eoin P. Hinchy, Yuansong Qiao, Niall Murray, and Declan Devine, Applied System Innovation, 2021, 4, 36.
  285. “A Survey on Digital Twin: Definitions, Characteristics, Applications, and Design Implications,” Barbara Rita Barricelli, Elena Casiraghi, and Daniela Fogli, IEEE Access, October 25, 2019.
  286. “Program Management versus Portfolio Management in Defense Acquisition,” NPS-PM-22-024, Naval Postgraduate School, March 1, 2022.
  287. “A Vision for a Platform-based Digital-Twin Ecosystem,” Henrique Diogo Silva, Miguel Azevedo, António Lucas Soares, INSEC TEC, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Volume 54, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 761-766.
  288. “Unified modeling for digital twin of a knowledge-based system design,” Haoqi Wang Hao Li, Xiaoyu Wen, and Guofu Luo, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Volume 68, April 2021.
  289. “Digital Twins: Bridging the Physical and Digital,” Aaron Parrott, Brian Umbenhauer, and Lan Warshaw, Deloitte Insights, 15 January 2020.
  290. “Digital Twin: An Overview,” Himani Mittal, CSI Communications, September 2020.
  291. “Real-time two-way data transfer with a Digital Twin via web interface,” Jani Hietala, Aalto University School of Engineering, 05.02.2020.
  292. “Conceptualizing Digital Twins,” Romina Eramo, Francis Bordeleau, Benoit Combemale, Mark van den Brand, Manuel Wimmer, Andreas Wortmann, IEEE Software March/April 2022.
  293. “Digital Twin: From Concept to Practice,” Ashwin Agrawal, Martin Fischer, Vishal Singh, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  294. Department of Defense (DoD) Digital Engineering Fundamentals, https://ac.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/DE-Fundamentals-2022.pdf
  295. APPLICATION OF PROCESS MODELING TOOLS TO SHIP DESIGN, David A. Helgerson, Seth Cooper, and Frank Waldman, NAVSEA, May 2011.
  296. 5D: The New Frontier for Digital Twins, WhereNext, Tech Trends, July 72, 2021, https://www.esri.com/about/newsroom/publications/wherenext/5d-the-new-frontier-for-digital-twins/
  297. “Digital Twins: State-of-The-Art Future Directions for Modelling and Simulation in Engineering Dynamics Applications,” D. J. Waag, K. Worden, B. J. Barthorpe, and P. Gardner, ASCE-ASME Journal Risk, and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B Mechanical Engineering, March 2020
  298. “Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesired Emergent Behaviors in Complex Systems,” Dr. Michael Grieves, Florida Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Innovative Design (CAMID), 2016.
  299. “Digital twins: Understanding the added value of integrated models for through-life engineering services,” Rok Vrabič, John Ahmet Erkoyuncu, Peter Butala, Rajkumar Roy, 7th International Conference on Through-Life Engineering Services, Procedia Manufacturing 16, pp. 139-146, 2018.
  300. “A digital twin-enhanced system for engineering product family design and optimization,” Kendrik Yan Hong Lim, Pai Zheng, Chun-Hsien Chen Lihui Huang, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 57, pp. 82-93, 2020.
  301. “Transforming data into decision making: A spotlight review of construction digital twin,” Yuhan Liu, Ke Chen, Ling Ma, Shu Tang, Tan Tan, CCREM 2021. 289-296.
  302. “Gemini Principles-Based Digital Twin Maturity Model for Asset Management, Long Chen, Xiang Xie, Qiuchen Lu, Ajith Kumar Parlikad, Michael Pitt, and Jian Yang, Sustainability 2021, 13
  303. “Digital twins for continuous deployment in model-based systems engineering of cyber-physical systems,” Joost Mertens and Joachim Denil, QUATIC’2020: 8th Software Engineering Doctoral Symposium, Sept 08, 2020.
  304. “Fenemies: OPM and SysML Together in an MBSE Model,” Matthew Hause, PTC October 2018.
  305. “Securing the Internet of Things with Object-Process Methodology Stereotypes,” Hanan Kohen and Dov Dori, IEEE March 14, 2022.
  306. “Mobility Digital Twin: Concept, Architecture, Case Study, and Future Challenges,” Ziran Wang, Rohit Gipta, Kyungate Han, Haixin Wangm Akila Ganlathm Nijib Ammrm and Prashant Tiwari, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.
  307. “Product Support in a Maintenance Free Operating Period Strategy,” Andrew Bellocchio, Kathryn Pegues, and Steven Chetcui, West Point Research Papers, 2021.
  308. “Department of Defense Digital Engineering Working Group ‒ Systems Engineering Digital Engineering Fundamentals, March 2016, https://ac.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/DE-Fundamentals.pdf
  309. “Barriers of Applying Building Information Modelling (BIM) According to BIM ISO,” Kong Sio Kah1, Ho Ming Qin, INTI International Journal, 2022.
  310. “Electrical system design and integration. A formula for success as complexity increases in aerospace,” Terry Foss and Steve Caravella, Siemens Digital Industries Software, 2021
  311. “Squaring the System of Systems Project Management Circle,” Charles K. Pickar, Naval Postgraduate School, in Engineering Processes for Complex Systems, IEEE ISSE 2020.
  312. “Review Current Value Engineering Studies Towards Improve Automation within Building Information Management (BIM),” Khalid S. A. Al-Gahtani, SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 9 Issue 2, 1-9, Feb 2022.
  313. “Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Project Management,” Mohamed Khaled Maher Abdalla, Politecnico Di Torino, Department of Management and Production Engineering.
    ​Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance, Harold Kerzner, Wiley 2017.
  314. “Implementation of “Digital Twin” Concept for Modern Project-Based Engineering Education,” S. Nikolaev, M. Gusev, D. Padalitsa, E. Mozhenkov, and S. Mishin, I. Uzhinsky, Implementation of “Digital Twin” Concept for Modern Project-Based Engineering Education. 15th IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), Jul 2018, Turin, Italy. pp.193-203.
  315. “Exploring the Concept of Cognitive Digital Twins from Model-Based Systems Engineering Perspective,” Jinzhi Lu, Zhaorui Yang, Xiaochen Zheng, Kian Wang, and Dimitris Kirtsis, Research Square March 21st, 2022.
  316. “Closed-Loop Digital Twin for the Product Lifecycle,” Luiz Fernando C. S. Durão, Eduardo Zancul, and Klaus Schützer, Research Square, February 18th, 2021.
  317. “Where is your Roadmap for implementing MBSE Data Standards?”, Mark Williams, John Nallon, and Juan Carlos Mendo, 2021 Annual INCOSE International Workshop, January 29-31, 2021.
  318. “Strategic Standarisaton Group: Standards Radar Chart,” V1.10 – Revision d, 3/10/2019, AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe.
  319. “Defense Primer: Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Process,” Congressional Research Service, December 22, 2021.
  320. “Framework For Managing System-of-systems Ilities,” Shian Chin, Eng Yau, Kok Wah, and Chung Khiang, DSTA Horizons, 2013/14
  321. “The Development of a Synthetic Battle Space,” Teo Chong Lai, Sim Kwang Lip Dave, Seet Yew Sing, Lee Mun Hong, Ho End Kian, DSTA Horizons, 2020.
  322. “System of Systems Primer,” INCOSE, 2018.
  323. ​​Principles of Modeling and Simulation: A Multidisciplinary Approach, John A. Sokolowski, Wiley, 2009.
  324. ​​​Early Systems Engineering Guidebook, United States Air Force, Version 1
  325. “System-of-Systems Engineering for Air Force Capability Development Executive Summary and Annotated Brief,” SAB-TR-05-04, July 2005, United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board.
  326. “Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems,” Version 1.0, Director, Systems, and Software Engineering, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) August 2008.
  327. “Quality Monitoring Of Coupled Digital Twins For Multistep Process Chains Using Bayesian Networks,” Maximilian Selch, Albrecht Hänel, Uwe Frieß, Steffen Ihlenfeldt, Conference on Production Systems and Logistics, CPSL 2021.
    “Digital Twin for Training Bayesian Networks for Fault Diagnostics of Manufacturing Systems,” Toyosi Ademujimi and Vittaldas Prabhu, Sensors 2022, 22, 1430.
  328. “C2PS: A Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems,” Kazi Masudul Alam and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik, IEEE Access, January 23, 2017.
  329. “On decision-making for adaptive models combining physics and data,” A. J. Hughes, R. J. Barthorpe, P. Gardner, D. J. Wagg, T. J. Rogers, E. J. Cross, and K. Worden, Dynamics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
  330. “A review of the technology standards for enabling digital twin,” Kai Yang, Yamin, Yizheng Li, Xiaohui Fan, Shanpeng Xiao, and Lin Hu.
  331. “Digital Twin Data: Methods and Key Technologies,” Meng Zhang, Fei Tao, Biqing Huang, Ang Liu, Lihui Wang, Nabil Anwer, A. Y. C. Nee, Digital Twin, 2022, 21 March 2022.
  332. “Interoperability of Digital Tools for the Monitoring and Control of Construction Projects,” Luz Duarte-Vidal, Rodrigo F. Herrera1, Edison Atencio1and Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera, Applied Sciences, 11, 10370, 2021.
  333. “Faster, Better, Cheaper – The Fallacy of MBSE?,” David Long, Vitech Corporation, 2015.
  334. “Probability of Program Success Operations Guide,” U.S. Army, May 2004,
  335. “Probability of Program Success (PoPS) Model, SMART Integration, Operations Guide, Version 1.0. U.S. Air Force, July 2008,
  336. "Naval PoPS Guidebook, Guidance for the Implementation of Naval PoPS, A Program Health Assessment Methodology for Navy and Marine Corps Acquisition Programs,” Version 1.0. Department of the Navy, September 2008,
  337. “Naval PoPS Criteria Handbook, Supplement for the Implementation of Naval PoPS”, Version 1.0, ​​​Department of the Navy, September 2008,
  338. “Introduction to Earned Value Management,” B. Meyers, EVM 101, ESC/AE (Acquisition Center of Excellence).
  339. “Analysis of Earned Value Data,” B. Meyers, EVM 401, ESC/AE (Acquisition Center of Excellence).
  340. "Technical Performance Measurement," M. Ferrari, Defense Contract Management Agency, Integrated Program Management Conference, November 14-17, 2001.
  341. “Technical Performance Measurement, Earned Value, and Risk Management: An Integrated Diagnostic Tool for Program Management, Program Executive Office for Air ASW, Assault, and Special Mission Programs (PEO [A]),”  Pisano, Commander N.D.,
  342. "Statement of Work (SOW) for Development, Production, Deployment, and Interim Contractor Support of the Minuteman Minimum Essential Emergency Communications Network (MEECN) Program," MMP Upgrade. June 28, 2007,
  343. "Using Data Types and Scales for Analysis and Decision Making," Acquisition Review Quarterly, p. 145. R. Pariseau, and I. Oswalt, Spring 1994.
  344. “Program Management Resources,” MITRE AiDA, https://aida.mitre.org/references/pm/ (a central resource for DoD Acquisition Management)
  345. ​From Digital Twins to Digital Selves and Beyond, Franz Barachini and Christian Stary, Springer, 2022.
  346. “Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects,” Chao Fang, Franck Marle, Enrico Zio, Jean-Claude Bocquet, HAL Open Science 22 October 2015.
  347. “Dealing with project complexity by matrix-based propagation modeling for project risk analysis,” Chao and Franck Marle, Journal of Engineering Design, Taylor Francis, 2012.
  348. “Virtualization of Production Using Digital Twin Technology,” Igor Halenar, Martin Juhás, Bohuslava, Juhásová, and Dmitrii Borkin, 2019 International Carpathian Control Conference, May 2019.
  349. “A Survey on AI-Driven Digital Twins in Industry 4.0: Smart Manufacturing and Advanced Robotics,” Ziqi Huang, Yang Shen, Jiayi Li, Marcel Fey, and Christian Brecher, Sensors, 21, 6340, 2021
  350. “Authoritative Source of Truth,” Tyesia P. Alexander and John H. Coleman, OMG Standards Development Organization, December 4, 2018. https://www.omgwiki.org/MBSE/doku.php?id=mbse:authoritative_source_of_truth
  351. “Department of Defense Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Outline,” Version 4.0, September 2021, Office of the Deputy Director of Engineering, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, Washington, D.C.
  352. “Industry 4.0, Digital Twins, and Generative Design Explained,” Michael P. Papazoglou, Systems Engineering Newsletter, 25 August 2020.
  353. “A Preview of the Next Generation System Modeling Language,” Sanford Friedenthal and Ed Seidewitz, Systems Engineering Journal 95, 27 November 2020.
  354. “Digital Twin Technology – Awareness, Implementation Problems and Benefits,” Małgorzata Gulewicz, ISSME, pp 63-77, 25 February 2022.
  355. “Paradigm of Digital Twin Application in Project Management in Architecture, Engineering and Construction,” Kwok Tak Kit, International Journal of Civil and Architectural Engineering,  Vol:16, No:4, 2022
  356. “Model Based Systems Engineering Industry Solution For Aerospace & Defense,” Siemens, 2021.
  357. “Enterprise System-of-Systems Model for Digital-Thread Enabled Acquisition,” Technical Report SERC-2018-TR-109, July 13, 2018
  358. “Dissecting the Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Digital Twins as a Service,” Milan Groshev, Carlos Guimarães, Antonio De La Oliva, And Robert Gazda, IEEE Access.
  359. SP 800‒213, IOT Device Cybersecurity Guidance for the Federal Government: Establishing IoT Device Cybersecurity.
  360. SP 800‒213A, IOT Device Cybersecurity Requirements Catalog
  361. SP 800‒53, Rev 5, Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations.
  362. “IEEE 1451 Smart Sensor Digital Twin Federation of IoT/CPS Research,” Yuyin Song, Martin J. Burns, Abhinav Pandey, and Thomas P. Roth, 2019 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS) ​
  363. ​​​IEEE 1451 Smart Sensor Digital Twin Federation for IoT/CPS Research, Eugene Y. Song, Martin Burns, Abhinav Pandey, and Thomas Roth, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society 2019.
  364. “Digital Twins and Cyber Security -solution or challenge?” David Holmes, Maria Papathanasaki, Maglaras Leandros, Mohamed Amine Ferrag IEEE August 2021.
  365. “Complex System Governance for Acquisition,” Joseph Bradley, Polinpapilnho Katina, Charles Keating, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Acquisition Symposium, April 30, 2016.
  366. “Challenges for Developing Complex System Governance,” Polinpapilinho F . Katina and Charles Keating, Proceedings of the 2015 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference.
  367. “Towards Digital Engineering ‒ The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering,” Jingwei Huang, Adrian Gheorghe, Holly Handley, Pilar Pazos, Ariel Pinto, Samuel Kovacic, Andrew Collins, Charles Keating, Andres Sousa-Poza, Ghaith Rabadi, Resit Unal, Teddy Cotter, Rafael Landaeta, Charles Daniels, International Journal of Systems Engineering.
  368. “Digital Twins and Cyber Security ‒ Solution or Challenge?” David Holmes, Maria Papathanasaki, Leandros Maglaras, Mohamed Amine Ferrag, Surya Nepal, and Helge Janicke, IEEE, 2021.
  369. “Framework for Managing System-Of-Systems Ilities,” Kang Shian, Pee Eng Yau, Sim Kok Wah, and Pang Chung Khiang, DSTA Horizons, 2013/14
  370. “The Forgotten ‘‒ilities’,” James D. Willis, Jr. and Dr. Steven Dam, SPEC Innovations
  371. ​​​Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, Fourth Edition, Wiley, INCOSE, 2015.
  372. “A Complexity Primer for Systems Engineers,” Revision 1, 2021, INCOSE
  373. “Guide for Writing Requirements,” 2019, ONCOSE.
  374. “Model Order Reduction A key technology for Digital Twins,” Dirk Hartmann, Matthias Herz, and Utz Wever, Siemens AG, November 17, 2017.
  375. “A Holistic System Lifecycle Engineering Approach – Closing the Loop between System Architecture and Digital Twins,” Thomas Dickopf, Hristo Apostolov, Patrick Müller, Jen C. Göbel, and Sven Forte, 29th CIRP Design 2019.
  376. “Experimentable Digital Twins for a Modeling and Simulation-based Engineering Approach,” Ulrich Dahment and Juergen Rossmann, IEEE, 2018.
  377. “Digital Twins,” Dirk Hartmann and Herman Van der Auweraer, Preprint, January 28, 2020, arXiv
  378. “Integrating Smart Documents: into PLM and the Digital Thread,” Bruce Mayer, PLM Road Map TM and PDT North America, Tysons Corner, VA, May 29-30, 2019.
  379. “Digital Engineering,” Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge,(SEBoK), Version 2.5, 15 October 2021, https://www.sebokwiki.org/wiki/Digital_Engineering
  380. “DoD Instruction 5000.88 Engineering Of Defense Systems,” November 18, 2020.
  381. “Impact of Digital Engineering Strategy Release,” Philomena (Phil) Zimmerman, Director, Engineering Tools and Environments, Office (OUSD Research & Engineering, (Advanced Capabilities), DAU, Sep 2021.
  382. “Digital Twin Paradigm Shift: The Journey of the Digital Twin Definition,” Martin Tomczyk and Hendrik van der Valk, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2022) - Volume 2, pages 90-97.
  383. “A Digital Twin Framework for Cyber Security in Cyber-Physical Systems,” Tianyu Zhao1, Ernest Foo, and Hui Tian,
  384. “A digital twin architecture for effective product lifecycle cost estimation,” Maryam Farsi, Dedy Ariansyah, John Ahmet Erkoyuncu, and Andrew Harrison, 31st CIRP Design Conference 2021
  385. “Model-Based Engineering for Product Support,” Shawn D. Harrison, Defense Acquisition Magazine, July 01, 2021, https://www.dau.edu/library/defense-atl/blog/Model-Based-Engineering-for-Product-Support.
  386. “Better Program Managing Through Digital Engineering,” Paul Solomon, Defense Acquisition Magazine, June 29, 2022, https://www.dau.edu/library/defense-atl/blog/Better-Program-Managing
  387. “Systems Engineering Guidebook,” Office of the Deputy Director for Engineering
  388. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, for Research and Engineering, February 2022.
  389. “Workshop with Industry Applying Digital Engineering To Reduce Acquisition Cycle Time,” Mr. Jimmie D Schuman Jr., Deputy Director of Transformational Innovation,
  390. “Digital Engineering Applications to Developmental Test & Evaluation,” Dr. Ed Kraft, NDIA / SAF/AQ-OTI, Workshop With Industry, Washington, DC, December 13, 2016
  391. “Applying Digital Engineering To Reduce Acquisition Cycle Time,” NDIA Workshop, https://www.ndia.org/-/media/sites/ndia/meetings-and-events/2016/december/air-force-workshop-december-13/dt_dtw-workshop-results.ashx
  392. “Technical Data as a Service (TDaaS) and the Valuation of Data Options,” Mr. George E. Thompson and Dr. Michael McGrath, Acquisition Research Program Sponsored Report Series, ANS-LM-19-175, 17 June 2019.
  393. “Architecture For A CBM+ And PHM Centric Digital Twin For Warfare Systems,” Ray A. Ashworth, Zachary Capacete, Matthew Casim, Garrett D. Dong, Joshua W. Gutterman, Carlos R. Riosmora, Jeffrey L. Smith, , July A. Thomson, Master of Science Thesis, Naval Post Graduate School, December 2021.
  394. “Operationalizing Digital Thread Through Model-based Systems Engineering Methods For Heavy Lift And Salvage Operations,” Eduardo E and Quintero Vera, Master Of Science In Systems Engineering Management from the Naval Postgraduate School, September 2021.
  395. “Digital Transformation for Defense Acquisition: Digital Engineering Competency Framework (DECF),” Nicole Hutchison, Hoong Yan See Tao, Kara Pepe, Mark Blackburn, Clifford Whitcomb, Rabia Khan, Russell Peak, Adam Baker, Dinesh Verma, May 11-13, 2021, Naval Postgraduate School.
  396. “Digital Twin Technology Awareness, Implementation Problems And Benefits,” Małgorzata Gulewicz, Engineering Management in Production and Services, Volume 14 • Issue 1 • 2022.
  397. “Data management for developing digital twin ontology model,” Sumit Singh, Essam Shehab, Nigel Higgins, Kevin Fowler, Dylan Reynolds, John A Erkoyuncu, and Peter Gadd, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Volume 235(4) 2323-2337.
  398. “Taking Control of the Digital Twin,” Marcus Bole, Gabriel Powell, and Eric Rousseau, SNAME SMC, October 2017.
  399. “Where the Rubber Meets the Road in Digital Engineering,” Eileen Bjorkman and John Grigaliunas, Defense Acquisition, November ‒ December 2021.
  400. “Considerations for Digital Twin Technology and Emerging Standards,” Jeffrey Voas, Peter Mell, and 7 Vartan Piroumian, Draft NIST 8356, April 2021.
  401. “A Guide to Applying the Principles of Virtual Design & Construction (VDC) to the Lean Project Delivery Process,” Atul Khanzode, Martin Fischer, Dean Reed, & Glenn Ballard, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, December 2006.
  402. “MBSE for Dummies,” Steve Kaelble, Wiley, 2022
  403. Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms,” Alberto Cerezo-Narváez, Andrés Pastor-Fernández, Manuel Otero-Mateo, Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez and Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, Sustainability 2021, 13, 885.
  404. “Uncertainty of data and the digital twin: a review,” José Rios, Reiner Anderi, and Peter Pelz, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2021.
  405. ​Enterprise Systems Engineering: Advances in the Theory and Practice,” edited by George Rebovich, Jr. and Brian E. White, CRC Press, 2011.
  406. “Implementation Recommendations for MOSAIC: A Workflow Architecture for Analytic Enrichment,” Ransom Winder Nathan Giles Joseph Jubinski, MITRE Technical Report, MTR-MNI-000-012, February 2011.
  407. “Benchmarking the Benefits and Current Maturity of Digital Engineering / Model-Based SE,” Tom McDermott, Nicole Hutchison, Megan Clifford, Eileen Van Aken, Alejandro Salado, and Kaitlin Henderson, Systems Engineering Research Center.
  408. “A Survey on the Challenges Hindering the Application of Data Science, Digital Twins and Design Automation in Engineering Practice,” S. Rädler and E. Rigger, International Design Conference – Design 2022, Artificial Intelligence and Data-Drive Design.
  409. “Digital Twin-Driven Approach for Process Management and Traceability towards Ship Industry,” Kan Wang, Qianqian Hu and Jialin Liu, Processes, 2022.
  410. ​Model‒Based System Architecture, Tim Weilkiens, Jesko G. Lamm, Stephan Roth, and Markus Walker, Wiley Series in Systems Engineering and Management, 2016
  411. “IOT Security Model Digital Twin Profile,” Jon Geater (Jitsuin), Frederick Hirsch (Upham Security), Detlev Richter (TÜV SÜD), Michael Robkin (Six By Six), Ron Zahavi (Microsoft).
  412. “Fault diagnosis and predictive maintenance for hydraulic system based on digital twin model,” Lintao Wanga, Yuchong Liub, Hang Yinc, and Wei Sund, AIP Advances, Volume 12, Issues 6, 2022.
  413. “Approach to Capability‒Based System‒of‒Systems Framework in Support of Naval Ship Design,” Cdr Jacques P Olivier, Royal Canadian Navy, Canada, Dr Santiago Balestrini‒Robinson, Dr. Simon Briceño, Georgia Institute of Technology, System of Systems Engineering Collaborators Information Exchange (SoSECIE), September 1st, 2015, NDIA.
  414. “A Capability‒based, Meta‒model Approach To Combatant Ship Design,” Jason Fox, Naval Postgraduate School, March 2011.
  415. “A DSM‒Based Validation Tool for Leveraged Optimization of Internal Control,” DS 112: Proceedings of the 23rd International DSM Conference (DSM 2021), Montréal, Canada, October 12 ‒ 14, 2021, Editor: Harold (Mike) Stowe; Tyson R. Browning, Steven D. Eppinger, Jakob Trauer, Author: Denise Hunter, Carl Klinger, William Dister, Tyson Browning.
  416. “Applying Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) to a Standard CubeSat,” Sara C. Spangelo, Et Al, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2012.
  417. Digital Twin for Defence Engineering Support, UK Ministry of Defense, September 2019.
  418. “The Comprehensive Guide to Successfully Adopting Model‒Based Systems Engineering (MBSE),” JAMA Software.
    “The Role of Simulation in Digital Twin Construction,” Yeung T., Martinez J., Sharoni L., Sacks R., 29th International Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering (EG‒ICE).​
  419. Emergent Behavior in System of Systems Engineering: Real‒World Applications, edited by Larry B. Rainey and O. Thomas Holland, CRC Press, 2023.
  420. “The Impacts Of Lean Implementation Revealed In The Course Of Building A Digital Twin Of A Construction Manufacturing Facility,” Fatima Alsakka, Mohammad Darwish, Haitao Yu, Farook Hamzeh, Mohamed Al‒Hussein, Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, (IGLC30), 890–901.
  421. “A High‒Level Risk Management Framework as Part of an Overall Asset Management Process for the Assessment of Industry 4.0 and Its Corollary Industry 5.0 Related New Emerging Technological Risks in Socio‒Technical Systems,” Issa Diop, Georges Abdul‒Nour, Dragan Komljenovic, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2022, 12, 1286‒1339.
  422. “A Brief Survey Of Creating A Digital Twin Architecture For Virtual Commissioning On The Machine Level,” Michal Kopček, Gabriela Križanová, Roman Ružarovský, Research Papers Faculty Of Materials Science And Technology In Trnava Slovak University Of Technology In Bratislava, Volume 30, Number 50, 2022.
  423. “The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles,” E. H. Glaessgen and D.S. Stargel, 53rd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference: Special Session on the Digital Twin, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  424. “Advancing Project Management with MultiDimensional Project Controls and Digital Twin,” Dr. Bahadir V. Barbarosoglu, CCP EVP PSP, and Ben Milner, 2022 AACE® International Technical Paper, CSC‒3831.
  425. “A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin ‒ Part 1: Modeling and Twinning Enabling Technologies,” Adam Thelen, Xiaoge Zhang, Olga Fink, Yan Lu, Sayan Ghosh, Byeng D. Youn, Michael D. Todd, Sankaran Mahadevan, Chao Hu1 and Zhen Hu, arXiv:2208.14197v1 [cs.CE] 26 Aug 2022.
  426. “A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin ‒ Part 2: Roles of Uncertainty Quantification and Optimization, a Battery Digital Twin, and Perspectives,” Adam Thelen, Xiaoge Zhang, Olga Fink, Yan Lu, Sayan Ghosh, Byeng D. Youn, Michael D. Todd, Sankaran Mahadevan, Chao Hu1 and Zhen Hu, arXiv:2208.12904v1 [cs.LG] 27 Aug 2022.
  427. “Maritime Digital Twin architecture A concept for holistic Digital Twin application for shipbuilding and shipping,” Jan‒Erik Giering and Alexander Dyck, Automatisierungstechnik, November 27, 2021.
  428. “Product Life‒Cycle Management in Ship Design: From Concept to Decommission in a Virtual Environment,” Andrade, S. L., Monteiro, T. G. and Gaspar, H. M., EMCS 2015 Proceedings, pp. 178‒184.
  429. “Driving Digital Engineering Integration and Interoperability Through Semantic Integration of Models with Ontologies,” Daniel Dunbar, Thomas Hagedorn, Mark Blackburn, John Dzielski1, Steven Hespelt, Benjamin Kruse, Dinesh Verma1, and Zhongyuan Yu, Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC).
  430. “When Internet of Things meets Metaverse: Convergence of Physical and Cyber Worlds,” Kai Li, Yingping Cui, Weicai Li, Tiejun Lv, Xin Yuan, Shenghong Li, Wei Ni, Meryem Simsek, and Falko Dressle, arXiv:2208.13501v1 [cs.NI] 29 Aug 2022, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.13501.pdf
  431. “Mission Engineering within the Digital Engineering Enterprise: Introducing Digital Mission Engineering,” Kevin Flood, July 2019.
  432. “Towards the Development of an Operational Digital Twin,” Paul Gardner, Mattia Dal Borgo, Valentina Ruffini, Aidan J. Hughes, Yichen Zhu, and David J. Wagg, Data‒Driven Modelling of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems, pp. 235‒265, 4 September 2020.
  433. “Digital Twin: Reference Model, Realizations, and Recommendations,” Olivia J. Pinon Fischer, et al., INCOSE Insight, 12 April 2022.
  434. “Digital Twin: Definition & Value,” An AIAA and AIA Position Paper, December 2020.
  435. “Past, present, and future research of digital twin for smart manufacturing,” Yoo Ho Son, Goo‒Young Kim, Hyeon Chan Kim, Chanmo Jun, Sang Do Noh, Journal of Computational Design and Manufacturing, 30 December 2021.
  436. “DoD Digital Modernization Strategy: DoD Information Resource Management Strategic Plan FY19‒23, Department of Defense
  437. “The Implementation of 5D Project Controls and Digital Twin,” Dr. Bahadir V. Barbarosoglu, CCP EVP PSP and Ben Milner PMP, 2022 Project Controls Expo
  438. “Design, Modeling, and Implementation of Digital Twins,” Mariana Segovia and Joaquin Garcia‒Alfaro, Sensors, 22, 5396.
  439. “Digital twins: What could they do for your business?” McKinsey & Company, October 2022.
  440. “Modeling & Simulation Management,” AIF 16‒1005, 23 June 2016. https://static.e‒publishing.af.mil/production/1/saf_aq/publication/afi16‒1005/afi16‒1005.pdf
  441. The Digital Transformation Playbook: Rethink Your Business for the Digital Age, David L. Rogers, 2016.
  442. “Digital Twin Development: Condition Monitoring and Simulation Comparison for the ReVolt Autonomous Model Ship,” Alexander Danielsen‒Haces, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, June 2018.
  443. “A Novel Methodology to Construct Digital Twin Models for Spacecraft Operations Using Fault and Behaviour Trees,” Nikolena Christofi and Xavier Pucel, Models ‘22 Companion, October 23‒28, 2033, Montreal, QC, Canada
  444. “DoD Digital Modernization Strategy,” DoD Information Resource Management Strategic Plan, FY 19‒23, Department of Defense.
  445. “Army Digital Transformation Strategy,” Office of the Army Chief Information Officer, Headquarters of the Army, 12 October 2021.
  446. “What Constitutes n Authoritative Source?” Roger Westman, CISSP, September 2, 2009, MITRE Corporation.
  447. “Ship Work Breakdown Structure through Different Ship Lifecycle Stages,” Malay Pal, Integration Conference on Computer Application to Shipbuilding, 2015 Bremen Germany.
  448. “4D Schedule Optimization for Project Monitoring of Existing Educational Building,” Bhavya Patel, Nisarg Patel, Akash Patel, and Sameer Patel, 12th Structural Engineering Convention‒An International Event (SEC 2022), ASPS Conference Proceedings 1: 1671‒1679 (2022).​
  449. Strategic Portfolio Management In the Multi‒Project and Program Organisation, edited by Katy Angliss and Pete Harpum, Tylor & Francis 2022.
  450. “Integrating Organizational and Technological Aspects of Digital Twin Engineering,” Benjamin Nast, Achim Reiz, Kurt Sandkuhl, and Janis Stirna, PoEM’2022 Workshops and Models at Work Papers, November 23‒25, 2022, London, UK.
  451. “Building the metaverse using digital twins at all scales, states, and relations,” Zhihan LV, Shuxuan XIE, Yuxi LI, M. Shamim HOSSAIN, Abdulmotaleb El SADIK, Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, December 2022, Vol. 4, No. 6:459‒470.
  452. “Integrated Project Delivery With BIM: An Automated EVM‒Based Approach,” Faris Elghaish, Sepehr Abrishami1, M.Reza Hosseini, Soliman Abu‒Samra, Mark Gaterell, Automation in Construction, July 2019.
  453. “Integrating BIM and Earned Value Management System to Measure Construction Progress,” Hani Alzraiee, ASCE Construction Research Congress, 2018.
  454. “Integration of Earn Value Management into BIM Projects,” Bejarano E, Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 2019.
    “Towards Developing Metric to Evaluate Digital Engineering,” Kaitlin Henderson, Tom McDermott, Eileen Van Aken, and Alejandro Salado, Systems Engineering, Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2023.
  455. “Advancing Project Management with MultiDimensional Project Controls and Digital Twin,” Dr. Bahadir V. Barbarosoglu, and Ben Milner, 2022 AACE International Technical Paper.
  456. “Asset Management Strategies in a Changing World,” NPMA.
  457. “Reflecting Reality ‒ Digital Twins: Adding Intelligence To The Real World,” Capgemini, 2022.
  458. “Embracing digital twin technology for engineering assets,” Steve Parvin, VP Engineering Information Management, Portfolio Strategy, https://discover.aveva.com/
  459. “Enabling Visual Community Learning Analytics with Internet of Things,” István Koren, Ralf Klamma, Computers in Human Behaviour, 2018, 385-394.
  460. “The Digital Twin – Birth of an Integrated System in the Digital Age,” Hendrik Wache and Barbara Dinter, Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020.
  461. “Economic Analysis of Model-Based Systems Engineering,” Azad M. Madni and Shatad Purohit, Systems, 7(1), 2019.
  462. “Collaborating with OpenMBEE as an Authoritative Source of Truth Environment,” Benjamin Kruse and Mark Blackburn, Procedia Computer Science, 153, 2019, 277-284.
  463. “Department of Defense (DoD) Digital Engineering Fundamentals.” https://ac.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/DE-Fundamentals-2022.pdf
  464. “The Digital Engineering, Modeling and Simulation (DEM&S) Glossary,” https://ac.cto.mil/de-ms-glossary/
    Engineering Complex Systems: With Models and Objects, David W. Oliver, Timothy P. Kelliher, and James G. Keegan, Jr. McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  465. “Theory of Modeling and Simulation – Discrete Event & Iterative Computational Foundations, 3rd Edition” Bernard P. Zeigler, Alexandre Muzy and Ernesto Kofman, Academic Press, 2019.
  466. “Digital Twin – A Tool for Project Management in Manufacturing,” Brian Hickey, Dr. Carine Gachon, Dr. John Cosgrove, 4th International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing, 4th International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing, 2022.
  467. “DCMA Manual 3101-02, Program Support,” April 14, 2021, https://www.dcma.mil/Portals/31/Documents/Policy/MAN_3101-01_REWRITEv2_20210414.pdf
    ​​
  468. Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems, Stefan Thurner, Rudolf Hanel, and Peter Klimek, Oxford University Press, 2018.
  469. “Adoption of Digital Twin Within the Department of the Navy,” Capt. Morgan B. White, USMC and Capt. Steven M. Ellington, USMA, Nava Postgraduate School, June 2022.
  470. “Digital Twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities,” Mohsen Attaran and Bilge Gokhan Celik, Decision Analytics Journal, 14 January 2023.
  471. “On the Double,” Jacqueline M. Hames, Army AT&L Magazine, September 13, 2021.
  472. “Digital Thread Implementation in the Air Force: AFRL’s Role,” NIST MBE Summit Pam Kobryn, AFRL/RQVS and Brench Boden, AFRL/RXMS
  473. “Is Digital Thread/Digital Twin Affordable? A Systemic Assessment of the Cost of DoD’s Latest Manhattan Project,” Timothy D. West and M. R. Blackburn, Procedia Computer Science, 114:47-56, December 2017.
  474. “Employing Digital Twins Within MBSE: Preliminary Results and Findings,” Azad M. Madni and Shatad Purohit, in Recent Trend and Advances in Model Based Systems Engineering.
  475. “Digital Twin Assessment, Agile Verification Processes, and Virtualization Technology,” Nickolas H. Guertin Director, July 2022.
  476. “Demystifying Digital Twin For Architecture, Engineering, and Construction,” Autodesk.
  477. “Enterprise System-of-Systems Model for Digital-Thread Enabled Acquisition,” Technical Report SERC-2018-TR-109 July 13, 2018.
  478. “An Impact Analysis of DFARS Clause 252.242.7005 on Contractor Business System Approval and Disapproval,” Symantha C. Loflin, Naval Postgraduate School, September 2020.
  479. “Industry 4.0, Digital Twins, and Generative Design Explained,” Michael P. Papazoglou, “Systems Engineering Newsletter, PPI SyEN 92, 25 August 2020.
  480. “SysML 4 Digital Twins – Utilization of System Models for the Design and Operation of Digital Twins,” F. Wilking, C. Sauer, B. Schleich, and S. Wartzack, International Design Conference ‒ Design 2022.
  481. “Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering,” Azad M. Madni, Carla C. Madni, and Scott D. Lucero, Systems 2019, 7, 7
  482. “MBSE Testbed for Rapid, Cost-Effective Prototyping and Evaluation of System Modeling Approaches, Azad M. Madni, Applied Sciences, 11, 2021.
  483. “Exploring the concept of Cognitive Digital Twin from model‑based systems engineering perspective,” Lu Jinzhi, Yang Zhaorui,, Zheng Xiaochen, Wang Jian, and Kiritsis Dimitris, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (2022) 121:5835–5854.
  484. “A Unique Collaborative DOD UARC” Executive Overview, Systems Engineering Research Center, January 32, 2023.
  485. “A Digital Twin Architecture Model Applied with MLOps Techniques to Improve Short-Term Energy Consumption Prediction,” by Tiago Yukio Fujii, Victor Takashi Hayashi, Reginaldo Arakaki, Wilson Vicente Ruggiero, Romeo Bulla Jr., Fabio Hirotsugu Hayashi, and Khalil Ahmad Khalil, Machines, 2022.
  486. “Supporting Concept Assessment in Engineering Design by Applying the Function Integrity Diagnosis and Documentation Method,” Robert Lawrence Wichmann, School of Design and Architecture, Swinburne University of Technology Advanced Manufacturing and Design Centre, 463 Burwood Rd, Hawthorn VIC 3122 Melbourne, Australia.
  487. “Model‒Based User Experience Design and Roadmapping. Application to a Smart Autonomous Vehicle Cockpit,” Ilia Iuskevich, Université Paris-Saclay, 2022.
  488. “Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems,” Michael Grieves and John Vickers, in Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches, Franz-Josef Kahlen, Shannon Flumerfelt, Anabela Alves, Editors, Springer
  489. “Digital Twins: Review and Challenges,” Maria G. Juarez, Vicente J. Botti, Adriana S. Giret, Valencian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Universitat Polit`ecnica de Val`encia, Valencia, 46022, Spain, ASME International.
  490. “How to Overcome 3D Model Issues and Limits for Industrial Projects,” https://projectvaluedelivery.com/
  491. “How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin,” Louise Wright and Stuart Davidson, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 7, Article number:13 (2020).
  492. “Take the Red Pill: The New Digital Acquisition Reality,” Will Roper, 15 September 2020, https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/7/Take_the_Red_Pill-Digital_Acquisition.pdf.
  493. “There is No Spoon: The New Digital Acquisition Reality,” Will Roger, 7 October 2020, https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo175277/There-Is-No-Spoon-Digital-Acquisition-7-Oct-2020-digital-version.pdf.
  494. “Digital Twins – Definitions, Classes, and Business Scenarios for Different Industry Sources,” F. Wilking, B. Schleich, and S. Wartzack, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 1293-1302.
  495. “Digital Thread and Twin for Systems Engineering: Requirements to Design,” Jeffrey V. Zweber, Raymond M. Kolonay, Pamela Kobryn, and Eric J. Tuegel, AIAA SciTech Forum, 9-13 January 2017.
  496. “Metamodelling of Manufacturing Processes and Automation Workflows towards Designing and Operating Digital Twins,” Panagiotis Stavropoulos, Alexios Papacharalampopoulos, Kyriakos Sabatakakis, and Dimitris Mourtzis, Applied Sciences, 2023, 13, 1945.
  497. “DAF Digital Transformation,” J. Kyle Hurst, Chief Digital Transformation Officer, 22 Sept 2022.
  498. “Building Information Management/Modeling (BIM) Phased Implementation Plan & Facility Electronic Operations and Maintenance Support Information (eOMSI),” David J. Gutierrez, BIM Program Manager, October 2015. NAVFAC.
  499. “Facilities Criteria (Fc) Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited Navy And Marine Corps Design Procedures,” FC 1-300-09N, 1 May 2014, Change 6, 9 July 2021.
  500. “An Introduction to Digital Twins: A Practical Guide to Next-Generation Optimization,” Andrew Waycott, May 10, 2017, New England Complex Systems Institute.
  501. “INCOSE Model-Based Capabilities Matrix and User’s Guide,” Joe Hale and Al Hoheb, Version 1.0, January 2020.
  502. “Transforming Systems Engineering Through Model-Based Systems Engineering,” Dr. Mark Blackburn, ART-022 Systems Engineering Research Center.
  503. “A BIM-Based Solution to Support Earned Value Management in Construction,” Anne-Marie Nsimire Mushamalirwa, Thesis, Técnico, Lisboa, July 2016.
  504. “United States Navy and Marine Corps Digital Systems Engineering Transformation Strategy,” Naval Postgraduate School, June 2020, https://nps.edu/documents/112507827/0/2020+Dist+A+DON+Digital+Sys+Eng+Transformation+Strategy+2+Jun+2020.pdf/
  505. “Department of Defense (DoD) Digital Engineering Fundamentals,” https://ac.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/DE-Fundamentals-2022.pdf
    NAVSEAINST 4790.1B Ser 04/143, 10 Apr 2007, EXPANDED SHIP WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (ESWBS) HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE CODES (HSC) FOR SHIPS, SHIP SYSTEMS, AND SURFACE COMBATANT SYSTEMS
  506. DATA & ANALYTICS USER GUIDE, CADE Cost Assessment Dara Enterprise
  507. “Advances of Digital Twins for Predictive Maintenance,” Yingchao Youa, Chong Chena, Fu Hu, Ying Liu, and Ze Ji, 3rd International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing, Procedia Computer Science 200 (2022) 1471–1480.
  508. “Considerations for Model Curation in Model-Centric Systems Engineering,” Lucies Reymondet, Donna H. Rhodes, and Adam M. Ross, April 29, 2016, Systems Engineering Research Initiative, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, April 19, 1016.
  509. “Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A Categorical Literature Review and Classification,” Werner Kritzinger, Matthias Karner, Georg Traar, Jan Henjes, Wilfried Sihn, IFAC PapersOnLine, Vol. 51, No. 11, pp. 1016-1022, 2018.
  510. “Cost-efficient digital twins for design space exploration: A modular platform approach,” Massimo Panarotto, Ola Isaksson, and Vanessa Vial, Computer in Industry, 145, 2023
  511. “Engineering Elegant Systems: Theory of Systems Engineering,” M. D. Watson, B. L. Mesmer, and P. A. Farrington, NASA/TP-2020500644, June 2020.
  512. “Engineering Elegant Systems: Postulates, Principles, and Hypothesis of Systems Engineering,” Michael D. Watson, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 8 November 2017.
  513. “Digital Twins: A Systematic Literature Review Based on Data Analysis and Topic Modeling,” Kuzma Kukushkin, Yury Ryabov and Alexey Borovkov, Data, 2022.
  514. “Dimensions of Digital Twin Applications - A Literature Review,” Martin Enders and Nadja Hoßbach, Twenty-fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Cancun, 2019.
  515. “Enterprise System-of-Systems Model for Digital-Thread Enabled Acquisition,” Technical Report SERC-2018-TR-109, July 13, 2018.
  516. “Towards A Digital Engineering Initialization Framework,” MS Thesis, Kristen Marie Vilcans, Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, May 2022.
  517. “DT Roadblocks Executive Summary and Next Steps: Executive Summary and Next Steps,” February 2022,” Digital Twin Hub, https://digitaltwinhub.co.uk/files/file/116-dt-roadblocks-executive-summary-and-next-steps/
  518. Defense Acquisition Guide,” 16 September 2013.

Posted at 03:45 PM in Compendium, Digital Twin |

Comments

Categories

Follow galleman on Twitter

 Subscribe in a reader

View Glen's profile on slideshare

Search

Recent Posts

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 03/2005
© Herding Cats
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported

Recent Comments

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner